Breakwater and Ball - Digital Monochrome, Lee Johnson |
After doing my research I still believe that it could well be. I've read several articles about how much better the monochrome image from a converted digital camera is from a colour image that has been converted.
First, I have to admit that I do love monochrome photography. There is just something about it and in my head I know it doesn't make sense, after all I do not see objects, people or landscapes in black and white. I see them in colour. I am of an age that I remember watching TV in black and white. Would I go back to those days? Nope, not really. I seriously think it's more of a nostalgia thing.
The Leica M Monochrom |
One of the options in the poll is 'No, I'm saving up for a Leica M Monochrom instead'. This option does sort of make sense to me. Why not have a camera that is dedicated to shoot just monochrome images? Ok, if I were going to spend that much money on a camera and lenses I would probably be looking to invest in a Pentax 645z or a quality large format film camera and not a Leica but at first the sentiment was there.
Heptonstall - Shot on Ilford FP4+ and scanned, Lee Johnson |
Perhaps a converted digital camera may shoot a monochrome image better than some of these options (I still think a negative and a nicely made print is more beautiful than any digital image) but for me, the quality I get using the techniques and equipment I have at my disposal are more than adequate for my needs.
If you are feeling brave you can convert a digital camera to a monochrome digital yourself. Petapixel have an article here.
No comments:
Post a Comment